What is the basis for a claim of misusing a firearm?
He had a permit, he had a job, he shot it 3 times at his workplace, I don't see any manager from the golf course saying this was an "unexpected" or "unacceptable" discharge of a firearm.
The video shows his ex-wife with him. She makes it very clear there was no "domestic violence". So what is the basis of a domestic violence charge?
All I can see is a bureaucracy going into denial, refusing to accept any version of the story except the one they have mysteriously manufactured.
What outrages me is that:
Buddy Tavares was viciously kicked for no reason. And the police really haven't acknowledged that. They are "we are investigating" mode. What is there to investigate when you have a video that shows the whole incident?
He was held for 3 days in jail before they brought he before a judge who then set a court date. Why the judge -- who should have looked at the video! -- didn't throw out the charge and immediately give the RCMP a tongue lashing is beyond me. Worse, the judge is letting the idea of "domestic violence" ride for the month of so until a court date. Why? On what basis is there a charge? The ex-wife was there and on video saying "no domestic violence". Is the judicial system so brain dead that it refuses to acknowledge fact? It will punish a guy with jail on the basis of a charge that morphs over time and which has no basis in fact. Bizarre! All I see is taxpayer dollars going down the tube to go through legal mumbo-jumbo before the obvious facts are finally acknowledged. Now I understand the need for an effective and rigorous judicial system. But the legal system must have prima facie "justice" to it. To hold a guy who was clearly assaulted by the RCMP on a charge where he wife is there saying "where did this charge come from?" should have immediately thrown the case out. Who made the charge. That person should be in jail and paying for expensive lawyers. Not Buddy Tavares!
I'm simply beside myself with outrage over the failure to provide the simplest level of natural justice. All I see is a "legal bureaucracy" grinding through meaningless actions while a grave misjustice continues unacknowledged. That guts my ability to believe that any justice can be had in such a brain dead system.
Update 2011jan16: Protests and civic pressure finally get the RCMP to move. From a report on Global TV. I've bolded the key bit:
Police are recommending that a Mountie be charged with assault causing bodily harm after the arrest of a man in Kelowna was caught on video.
Police from the community of Abbotsford, B.C. were brought in to conduct a review following the arrest of Buddy Tavares, 51, on Jan. 7.
A recording of the arrest appeared to show an officer kicking Tavares in the head.
The announcement Sunday that the Mountie be charged came just before a planned protest in Kelowna over the incident.
...
"When police violence against a compliant and non-violent citizen occurs, the public needs to know that strong and swift action will be taken," said New Democrat public safety critic Don Davies, who is also the Vancouver Kingsway member of Parliament. "Until RCMP oversight is strengthened, public confidence in the RCMP will continue to erode."
"The incident in Kelowna should be a wake-up call to the government that they have dragged their feet for too-long on RCMP reform," said Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP Nathan Cullen.
"The government has known for years that the system is broken, but even their own meagre reform bill is stalled in Parliament because they refuse to bring it forward for debate."
Here is an interview with Buddy Tavares talking about using a shotgun on the golf course. This interview was posted on www.castanet.net with the comment "Extensive interview with Buddy Tavares, the Kelowna man kicked in the face by a Kelowna RCMP officer during an arrest. (Video-Kelly Hayes)". I picked this up from Straight.com:
I especially enjoy the bit at 13:15 where he is asked for his opinion about the RCMP. Buddy Tavares shows himself to be gracious and wise in his assessment. His bottom line: there is good and bad in everything. He says "if there is a bad apple you don't throw out the whole box". I must confess that in my emotional reaction I was willing to call for tossing out the whole box. Buddy shows a great deal more equanimity than I have. He is more forgiving than I am. He strikes me as a really decent person. He strikes me as a very, very honest guy. It is pretty clear he isn't going to "forgive" the RCMP for assaulting him. You can see the emotion in his face. He wants to be a "good" person, but you can tell that hate wells up when he is asked about "forgiveness". It is a tragedy that he was the victim of this crime. He is obviously struggling with its consequences.
Update 2010jan18It is interesting to note that the Abbotsford police was called in to review the Kelowna RCMP to look into the possibility of charging Geoff Mantler with assault. This is especially curious because of the following video showing the behaviour of Abbotsford police a year ago. This video is from Global TV BC and is dated October 21, 2009:
The Abbotsford police did recommend assault charges. But they did that just shortly before a large demonstration was to start in Kelowna. Those who are cynical might think there is a connection in the timing. It is just too convenient that the decision to charge Geoff Mantler "happened" shortly before the demonstration and just "happened" to cool down the ardor of the demonstrators.
The cynical might also be excused for wondering about the capability of the Abbotsford police to "judge" the behaviour of the Kelowna police. Both police forces belong to the RCMP. It is the old story of the RCMP "investigating itself". That is a problem. There will be public confidence in the police only when there is an independent police complaints organization that will review the police without a tendency to let "sympathy for fellow RCMP officers" cloud their judgement. The public deserves a true, honest independent investigation of police brutality charges.
Update 2011jan20: Here is a video of the demonstration held in Kelowna with the accompanying news story:
I enjoyed your article. I'm behind this cause 100%.
One thing I wanted to point out is that I heard on one of the news articles that Buddy himself, volunteered to stay in remand over the weekend until his bail hearing and recent release.
Now the cop who kicked him is being punished by a ""Paid Vacation" until the public attention span subsides. Some punishment! I tried to help a friend, 20 years ago, file a complaint against Campbell River cops, who repeatedly framed and beat her, for having filed a complaint. The vendetta is still going on. A friend ,who was appointed BC attorney general at the time, didn't have the huevos to stand up to them in any way. These abuses are a direct result of his cowardice. .
In case you haven't been following all the stories, here are some points you may have missed: 1) Taveres was NOT working; he was on leave due to a brain injury. Why was he at the golf course where his ex just happened to be working? Why was he carrying a gun? 2) Taveres' gun permit was expired. Again, why was he carrying a gun? 3) As per points one and two, why was Taveres carrying a gun?? Even if he was to be scaring off geese in the course of his employment: a. there are no golfers and likely no geese out there at this time of year, b. he wasn't working for the golf course at the time of this incident, and c. he didn't have a permit for the gun. An EXPIRED permit is NOT A PERMIT, people. 4) Why was 911 called? If he was scaring off geese - the impossibility of this I've already pointed out - why would a coworker call 911 and report that there was a domestic disturbance between Taveres and his ex, and that Taveres was shooting? What started this whole thing? An emergency call to report that he was being violent and was involved in a dispute with his ex. What is "mind-boggling", a word that Mr. Taveres seems to prefer, is that the public can't seem to put two and two together! He was harrassing his ex, someone - possibly even the ex herself - called 911 and now that he's in the limelight and a poor, poor victim she suddenly denies there was anything going on between them. This is TEXTBOOK for women in abusive relationships. I can't count the number of times the police in my family relay similar stories; they try to help a woman, and next thing you know she's got a weapon or is making false claims while her husband continues to abuse her! WHY DID SOMEONE CALL 911 AND WHY WAS TAVARES FIRING A GUN ON PROPERTY HE WAS NOT EVEN SUPPOSED TO BE ON? Think, people! This was not an innocent man. Innocent men don't go waving guns about and threatening women with whom they've had a volatile relationship for some time. They then don't leave the scene and are chased down by several police cars and cause a high-risk take-down. And he wasn't charged for a domestic disturbance... You think that means it didn't happen, you complete and utter morons? Seriously - what do you expect??? They can't charge him for doing anything to her when she is denying it! It doesn't mean it didn't happen - it just means she is denying it and not allowing them to do their jobs. They cannot charge him with someone they didn't see happen if the parties involved are denying it. Mark my words... five years from now when you've all forgotten about what really happened in this incident, she will be calling the cops because she's afraid Tavares is going to kill her. Again.
Thank you for your clarifications. If I understand your logic, when somebody reports a gun discharged that is automatically a green light for the police to kick a guy in the head.
Oh... and you are from the school of thought that has decided that the RCMP are "judge, jury, and executioner". Great. That will save taxpayers a lot of money. We can dispense with prosecutors, judges, and the courts.
As for your other "facts"... I see nothing in what you say that justifies booting a guy who is down on all fours in the face. But I guess we differ over the niceties of "police procedures". I prefer my police to be professional. You obviously prefer your police to be thugs.
By the way... PUTTING EVERYTHING ALL IN CAPS doesn't make it true. It just makes you look like a fanatic.
If you viewed the long interview at the bottom of the above post, you will find that Tavares appears much more generous and reasonable than you come across. Tavares is willing to admit that not all the RCMP are bad. He views his assault as an example of "bad apples" in the police force. Something which you have obviously never considered. And, by the way, there has been the decision of the independent review by the Abbotsford police who have recommended assault charges against the RCMP officer.
I don't know the true facts. I'm sure you don't know the true facts. That is why we have courts. They will -- hopefully -- dig into the facts of this case and it will be resolved properly. I'm willing to wait for justice to be done. I don't want my judicial system to be delivered by the end of a boot in my face.
I don't care what the circumstances are leading up to the video we witnessed. If he did threaten his ex-wife he should have been arrested no question. BUT what I see is a man getting down on all fours as told to by the police and while he is in no threatening position is viciously booted in the head. Cops in the family or not, this should outrage you. I see this and I lose all respect for police and that means both the good and bad ones.
For someone to defend this action as just another officer doing his job in the face of danger is ludricrous. When this all blows over this "officer" will likely get a slap on the wrist. He should be thrown in jail to make an example of what we will not tolerate as a society.
What I see on this video is a thug and I don't mean the guy on the ground on his hands and knees.
5 comments:
I enjoyed your article. I'm behind this cause 100%.
One thing I wanted to point out is that I heard on one of the news articles that Buddy himself, volunteered to stay in remand over the weekend until his bail hearing and recent release.
Now the cop who kicked him is being punished by a ""Paid Vacation" until the public attention span subsides.
Some punishment!
I tried to help a friend, 20 years ago, file a complaint against Campbell River cops, who repeatedly framed and beat her, for having filed a complaint. The vendetta is still going on. A friend ,who was appointed BC attorney general at the time, didn't have the huevos to stand up to them in any way. These abuses are a direct result of his cowardice. .
In case you haven't been following all the stories, here are some points you may have missed:
1) Taveres was NOT working; he was on leave due to a brain injury. Why was he at the golf course where his ex just happened to be working? Why was he carrying a gun?
2) Taveres' gun permit was expired. Again, why was he carrying a gun?
3) As per points one and two, why was Taveres carrying a gun?? Even if he was to be scaring off geese in the course of his employment: a. there are no golfers and likely no geese out there at this time of year, b. he wasn't working for the golf course at the time of this incident, and c. he didn't have a permit for the gun. An EXPIRED permit is NOT A PERMIT, people.
4) Why was 911 called? If he was scaring off geese - the impossibility of this I've already pointed out - why would a coworker call 911 and report that there was a domestic disturbance between Taveres and his ex, and that Taveres was shooting? What started this whole thing? An emergency call to report that he was being violent and was involved in a dispute with his ex.
What is "mind-boggling", a word that Mr. Taveres seems to prefer, is that the public can't seem to put two and two together! He was harrassing his ex, someone - possibly even the ex herself - called 911 and now that he's in the limelight and a poor, poor victim she suddenly denies there was anything going on between them. This is TEXTBOOK for women in abusive relationships. I can't count the number of times the police in my family relay similar stories; they try to help a woman, and next thing you know she's got a weapon or is making false claims while her husband continues to abuse her!
WHY DID SOMEONE CALL 911 AND WHY WAS TAVARES FIRING A GUN ON PROPERTY HE WAS NOT EVEN SUPPOSED TO BE ON?
Think, people! This was not an innocent man. Innocent men don't go waving guns about and threatening women with whom they've had a volatile relationship for some time. They then don't leave the scene and are chased down by several police cars and cause a high-risk take-down.
And he wasn't charged for a domestic disturbance... You think that means it didn't happen, you complete and utter morons? Seriously - what do you expect??? They can't charge him for doing anything to her when she is denying it! It doesn't mean it didn't happen - it just means she is denying it and not allowing them to do their jobs. They cannot charge him with someone they didn't see happen if the parties involved are denying it.
Mark my words... five years from now when you've all forgotten about what really happened in this incident, she will be calling the cops because she's afraid Tavares is going to kill her. Again.
Anonymous:
Thank you for your clarifications. If I understand your logic, when somebody reports a gun discharged that is automatically a green light for the police to kick a guy in the head.
Oh... and you are from the school of thought that has decided that the RCMP are "judge, jury, and executioner". Great. That will save taxpayers a lot of money. We can dispense with prosecutors, judges, and the courts.
As for your other "facts"... I see nothing in what you say that justifies booting a guy who is down on all fours in the face. But I guess we differ over the niceties of "police procedures". I prefer my police to be professional. You obviously prefer your police to be thugs.
By the way... PUTTING EVERYTHING ALL IN CAPS doesn't make it true. It just makes you look like a fanatic.
If you viewed the long interview at the bottom of the above post, you will find that Tavares appears much more generous and reasonable than you come across. Tavares is willing to admit that not all the RCMP are bad. He views his assault as an example of "bad apples" in the police force. Something which you have obviously never considered. And, by the way, there has been the decision of the independent review by the Abbotsford police who have recommended assault charges against the RCMP officer.
I don't know the true facts. I'm sure you don't know the true facts. That is why we have courts. They will -- hopefully -- dig into the facts of this case and it will be resolved properly. I'm willing to wait for justice to be done. I don't want my judicial system to be delivered by the end of a boot in my face.
I don't care what the circumstances are leading up to the video we witnessed. If he did threaten his ex-wife he should have been arrested no question. BUT what I see is a man getting down on all fours as told to by the police and while he is in no threatening position is viciously booted in the head. Cops in the family or not, this should outrage you. I see this and I lose all respect for police and that means both the good and bad ones.
For someone to defend this action as just another officer doing his job in the face of danger is ludricrous. When this all blows over this "officer" will likely get a slap on the wrist. He should be thrown in jail to make an example of what we will not tolerate as a society.
What I see on this video is a thug and I don't mean the guy on the ground on his hands and knees.
Post a Comment