There were always two modes of tort reformers. There were people who said relying on tort lawsuits to assess liability a lousy system because it (a) provides screwy incentives and (b) gives out semi-random lottery wins to a few. And there were people who said that filing a tort lawsuit was an act of theft and piracy. Bork was always in the second camp.
If somebody in the first camp wants to file a slip-and-fall lawsuit, I say fine: the fact that they think the system is bad from a utilitarian perspective doesn't make it in any sense immoral for them to exercise their rights under it. People in the second camp--like Robert Bork--are a different kettle of fish entirely. If they truly believe tort lawsuits are bad because they are acts of piracy and theft, then Robert Bork is a self-confessed pirate and thief...
Thursday, August 7, 2008
And the Academy Award for Hypocrisy Goes to...
Brad Delong points out the hypocrisy of right wing former Supreme Court appointee Robert H. Bork, a long time advocate for reform, who just won a tort action for $1 million against the Yale Club for a fall he took climbing up to the podium:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment