Sunday, May 31, 2009

Revisionist History

The interpretation of the past keeps changing. The facts change very little, but the interpretations manage remarkable changes. Here's an article in the Guardian by Rory Carroll that is a bit of a shocker:
North African pirates abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between 1530 and 1780 in a series of raids which depopulated coastal towns from Sicily to Cornwall, according to new research.

Thousands of white Christians were seized every year to work as galley slaves, labourers and concubines for Muslim overlords in what is today Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Libya, it is claimed.

Scholars have long known of the slave raids on Europe. But American historian Robert Davis has calculated that the total number captured - although small compared with the 12 million Africans shipped to the Americas in later years - was far higher than previously recognised.

His new book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, concluded that 1 million to 1.25 million ended up in bondage.

Prof Davis's unorthodox methodology split historians over whether his estimates were plausible but they welcomed any attempt to fill a gap in the little-known story of Africans subjugating Europeans.

By collating different sources of information from Europe over three centuries, the University of Ohio professor has painted a picture of a continent at the mercy of pirates from the Barbary Coast, known as corsairs, who sailed in lateen-rigged xebecs and oared galleys.

Villages and towns on the coast of Italy, Spain, Portugal and France were hardest hit but the raiders also seized people in Britain, Ireland and Iceland. According to one account they even captured 130 American seamen from ships that they boarded in the Atlantic and Mediterranean between 1785 and 1793.

In the absence of detailed written records such as customs forms Prof Davis decided to extrapolate from the best records available indicating how many slaves were at a particular location at a single time and calculate how many new slaves were needed to replace those who died, escaped or were freed.

To keep the slave population stable, around one quarter had to be replaced each year, which for the period 1580 to 1680 meant around 8,500 new slaves per annum, totalling 850,000.

The same methodology would suggest 475,000 were abducted in the previous and following centuries.

...

Dr Earle also cautioned that the picture was clouded by the fact the corsairs also seized non-Christian whites from eastern Europe and black people from west Africa. "I wouldn't hazard a guess about the total."

According to one estimate, 7,000 English people were abducted between 1622-1644, many of them ships' crews and passengers. But the corsairs also landed on unguarded beaches, often at night, to snatch the unwary.

Almost all the inhabitants of the village of Baltimore, in Ireland, were captured in 1631, and there were other raids in Devon and Cornwall.

...

In comments which may stoke controversy, he said that white slavery had been minimised or ignored because academics preferred to treat Europeans as evil colonialists rather than as victims.

While Africans laboured on sugar and cotton plantations the European slaves were put to work in quarries, building sites and galleys and endured malnutrition, disease and maltreatment.

Ruling pashas, entitled to an eighth of all captured Christians, housed them in overcrowded baths known as baƱos and used them for public works such as building harbours and cutting trees. They were given loaves of black bread and water.

The pasha's female captives were more likely to be regarded as hostages to be bargained for ransom but many worked as attendants in the palace harem while awaiting payment and freedom, which in some cases never came. Some slaves bought by private individuals were well treated and became companions, others were overworked and beaten.

"The most unlucky ended up stuck and forgotten out in the desert, in some sleepy town such as Suez, or in the Turkish sultan's galleys, where some slaves rowed for decades without ever setting foot on shore," said Prof Davis, whose book is published in the US by Palgrave Macmillan.
I've been reading Obama's Dreams from My Father and have been bothered by the dreary view that "blacks are oppressed" all through the book. The joke is that this is a historical accident. Any group can be oppressed by any other group. There is in human nature an evil temptation to live at the expense of some other person. Today's capitalist society is a "tamed" version of slavery. Those with wealth are able to put invisible shackles on the poor and get them to put in long hours to further enrich the elite of society. This has been our fate since we stopped being hunters and gathers and settled down and accumulated wealth that could be stolen or controlled.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

I really enjoyed reading this post.. Its amazing what the world opinion of our people was at that time. It won't take much for things to turn on us again. I hope we can get over of our arrogant opinion of ourselves and learn to be a positive influence in the world.

RYviewpoint said...

The good news about decline is that it happens slowly enough that you ease into it without noticing. That's how you end up with aristocrats living proudly in poverty still thinking they are "better" than the poor folk around them.

Hopefully this won't be the fate of the US and instead it will rebound. I watched the US rebound with high technology in the 1980s. That was an era of greed, but it was also an era of hard work. The myths of Silicon Valley were of putting in long hours at startups to get vested with stock options that could be cashed in for a big payday. The tragedy of the last two decades, with the rise of finance capitalism, was that money flowed to the "smart" people of Wall Street who produced nothing while mocking the ethic of honest labour (they wanted to outsource everything except the "creative" stuff). Their "success" was pure financial manipulation.

Hopefully the US will go back to more traditional values of hard work and useful inventiveness. I've got nothing against "financial innovation" but the rewards need to be in line with the real contribution toward society. The financial sector in the US grew to be 40% of the economy. That's way out of line with any "value" they created. And their "contribution" ended up being built on a foundation of sand that has brought everybody down. Their greed took not just them down, but the whole society, and ultimately the rest of the world.

I'm a pessimistic optimist. The long arc of history is improvement. The sad reality is there are lots of ups and down. I think the rightward lurch from 1980-2008 is now over and things will get better. Instead of a veneer of "family values" plastered over financial manipulation, I'm hoping for a future of a real "civic-mindedness" bolstered by a new surge in industry and service that creates real wealth to be spread around.