The prospects for health care reform seem to be dimming. If I were a progressive I would be wondering right now whether Medicare was a tactical mistake. The passage of Medicare meant that most old people get government-provided health care coverage. Yet the way to get things done in this country, politically, is to get old people behind them. Further health care reform doesn't now seem to promise much to old people, except spending cuts on them. Given their limited time horizons, old people don't so much value system-wide improvements, which invariably take some while to pay off.This posting demonstrates the ugly reality of special interest politics in a democracy. Everybody agrees that democracy is an ugly way to govern, but as Churchill pointed out, compared to any other way to organize a society, democracy is the best of a bad lot.
If Medicare had not been passed, might this country have instituted universal health care coverage sometime in the 1970s?
Humans tend to be altruistic, so you can appeal to altruism to try to put in place a universal health care system. Whether that can overcome the special interests is not clear. For what it is worth, getting a universal healthcare system in Canada was a long and ugly battle against doctors and insurance companies. But they weren't as organized in Canada, so it was easier for Canada than it will be for the US.
No comments:
Post a Comment